Energy Vortex and New Age Spirituality
While
the blog series has explored the broader place essentialism of the Machu Picchu
several layers remain to be unpacked. Several smaller forms of essentialism
serve to contribute to this greater misunderstanding, one of the most glaring being
the promotion of Machu Picchu as an “energy vortex” and the rise of “spiritual
tourism.”
Numerous online organisations promote travel to Machu Picchu and use this spiritualism as a means of enticing foreigners. “Ticket Machu Picchu” is an example of this, going so far as to assert that the “recurrent tremors and earthquakes” provoke the “energy” tourists feel in the mountain. These tours often frame the historic site as a means of personal discovery and cosmic power – fitting the Western New Age form of spirituality. This is a compelling means of drawing in tourists, but one that detracts from historical, scientific, and cultural complexity. As Massey (1995) explains, essentialist narratives often rely on a fixed idea of place, ignoring its dynamism and the multiple stories that intersect within it. This idea plays out at Machu Picchu, where spirituality often overshadows the site's evolving cultural reality.
Despite
this, it would be disingenuous to cast all organisations under the same light.
There exist several more recent tourism groups that frame the travel around the
Incan way of life, acknowledge the Machu Picchu as a “testament” to the Incan
people (Kondor Paths Tours). By representing the Incan culture and history of
the mountain city through the tourism, the essentialist outlook is directly challenged,
though the risk of stereotyping or commodifying the culture remains.
Ultimately,
place essentialism in the Machu Picchu is an ongoing problem. It reduces a
complex, live culture into a marketable brand for tourists at the expense of an
evolving community. Whether the overall disregard for Incan knowledge or the more
niche compartmentalisation into an “energy vortex,” it is only through engagement
and learning that essentialism can be opposed.

No comments:
Post a Comment